Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
How in the world does EVERY WalMart store in the country costs the government around 900,000 dollars in entitlements to each state. If so, do the state revenues collected and taxes paid outweigh such claims. I don’t think that this story will get much traction, and “being reported” are just weasel words which gives false credit to any hopeful thought or cause. I am sure the anti-walmart folks will take it hook, line and sinker.
Good article, Dex. But I watched the many commercials during the NFL and College football games this weekend from the ACA website they say and happy days are here again.
I was happy to see that as the few of us who actually pay taxes footed the bill for the commercials. Although the argument from the left could explain that no money from that tax collections were used, Only on funds derived by quantitative easing.
Profits, what a dirty word. It keeps business going. Sure comes in handy on payroll day and for the ability to employ workers. At least for me.
The big “dirty” corporations sure have done well with this administrations pumping the market with our future moneys every month though. Meet the new boss…………
“Obama care is also undeniably flawed but is the best that could be expected in the political gridlock that congress has become”. Obviously false statement. Obamacare passed with the democratic majority in the house, a necessary super-majority in the senate and the white house. If universal health care was wanted, a party line vote would have given the United States that. Unfortunately the ACA was passed (shoved) through without time for anybody to really check it out and signed without being published for three days as the American people were promised. You know, “we have to pass it so we can see whats in it”. Huh?
Yes, I am opposed to Obamacare. Mandatory medical insurance is not healthcare. The website is just an example of things that are too big for the federal government to handle efficiently and the disregard to details. Medical reform is necessary, but the need to gut one of the best medical care systems in the world shouldn’t be included. Especially without tackling tort reform.
Many points of Obamacare are good. The whole package sucks. I would simply say, the bill has been passed into law. The deception and the how will be judged by the voters. For the voters to understand the impact of the law it should have simply been funded and put into place on Oct 1 as described in the law with a few simple logical differences. No Exemptions, No exclusions and No Waivers. If it works out better for the people then the Democrats will own it and do well in the 2014 and 2016 elections and it would be good for the country. If, it is indeed a “train wreck” then the Republicans would do well and have an actual chance to change or repeal it. The damage will be done financially either way (different subject)
I could be wrong but I would bet on the latter.
